Re: [bpfk] Re: If you're reading this, *you* are the BPFK (AKA: help very much wanted)

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:11 AM, Robin Lee Powell
<rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 07:34:05AM -0700, lincro wrote:
>>
>> How much of a concern is the formatting as a goal in itself?  For
>> example, if I see that
>> http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section%3A+Highlight+Discursives
>> isn't green, but that it seems complete (I'm not saying that it
>> actually is), except that the format isn't like the template,
>> should effort be expended to get into the same format as the
>> template?

One reason the sections I wrote don't follow the template format is
that many of them were done before the standard template was
implemented.

But the main reason I continue to prefer my format is that I find the
results of the template unreadable. It crowds the page with irrelevant
information "this is a definition", "these are examples", "these are
keywords", and the actual part that needs to be highlighted, namely
the word being defined, is lost in a sea of pointless headings.

If and when the template is needed for some eventual automatic
processing of the content, then I will be happy for the pages under my
direct responsibility to be reformatted into ugly format, but for the
time being please leave them in readable form.

> Only at the end of everything else; please prioritize incomplete
> cmavo over formatting issues.

Yes, that's more concise. :)

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.