Re: [bpfk] Proposed grammar change: BIhI with only one GAhO

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

I have no idea what you're talking about, but I like simplicity, and I can understand what xorxes is talking about, so I vote "abstain".

2010/4/19 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
>
> Is this a sensible change?

It is sensible, but I think even more sensible would be to move
selma'o GAhO to UI, so we can say things like:

 lo sirji be ko'a ga'o bei ko'e ke'i
 "The interval between ko'a (inclusive) and ko'e (exclusive)"

Then selma'o BIhI can be merged with selma'o JOI, as the only
difference between them is whether they can take GAhO or not.

This is part of my campaign to reduce unnecessary selmaho clutter.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.