Re: [bpfk] Proposed grammar change: BIhI with only one GAhO

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
> On Monday 19 April 2010 13:53:36 Jorge Llambías wrote:
>>
>>   lo sirji be ko'a ga'o bei ko'e ke'i
>>   "The interval between ko'a (inclusive) and ko'e (exclusive)"
>
> How would you interpret this sentence?
> le kumte cu zvati la misr. bi'i la xantyde'i ga'o xaskoi ku bi'i la jerx.
> Or "... bi'i la kot. ga'o divuar. bi'i ...".

I probably wouldn't say something like that any more than I would say
something like "la xantyde'i po'o xaskoi" or "la xantyde'i ji'a
xaskoi": "the Ivory-only Coast"? "the Ivory-too Coast"? similarly:
"the Ivory-included Coast"? It's not completely meaningless, it's just
unusual to change names like that.

ga'o and ke'i belong in the same group with po'o, ji'a, mi'u, si'a, ku'i.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.