On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Jonathan Jones
<eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Jonathan Jones
<eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Jonathan Jones
<eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Arnt Richard Johansen
<arj@nvg.org> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 07:44:40PM -0600, Jonathan Jones wrote:
> I would like to at this time seek approval for removing the following
> entries from the BPFK Section:
> Tense<http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=BPFK+Section%3A+Tense>page:
>
> {baba}¹
> {bapu}¹
> {puba}¹
> {pupu}¹
>
> {baca'a}²
> {caca'a}²
> {cajeba}²
> {puca'a}²
> {pujeba}²
> {pujeca}²
> {puza}²
> {puze'a}²
> {puze'i}²
> {puze'u}²
> {puzi}²
> {puzu}²
>
> ¹ Official meaning differs from usage, as well as being non-intuitive.
> ² Meaning is obvious given meaning of components and therefore does not need
> it's own entry.
Agreed, provided that the entries for selma'o JA be updated to accurately reflect their tense-coordinating function. They do not currently do so, see http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=BPFK+Section%3A+Logical+Connectives
--
Arnt Richard Johansen http://arj.nvg.org/
Public Notice as Required by Law: Any Use of This Product, in Any
Manner Whatsoever, Will Increase the Amount of Disorder in the
Universe. Although No Liability Is Implied Herein, the Consumer Is
Warned That This Process Will Ultimately Lead to the Heat Death of the
Universe. --Susan Hewitt and Edward Subitzky
I have added the note: "May be combined with PU to indicate multiple tenses." to each of the JA cmavo, excepting {jo nai}, and also added the Usage Example from the PUJAPU that were deleted to the Usage Examples for the JA (All of them use {je}, as I mentioned). If that's not enough, let me know.