Re: [bpfk] Re: BPFK work - getting it done.

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Lindar <lindarthebard@yahoo.com> wrote:

FWIW I disagree with pretty much anything you say, Mr. Jones,

Still haven't gotten over our little disagreement about cu and ku, eh? .u'icai zo'o

We agree on a lot more than you think, by the way.
 

but I agree with removing them. They don't need a definition, they need a
section in some kind of reading material to give newbies the idea of
"You can link multiple tcita or use je to use multiple tcita
simultaneously.".

So... second.

(Do I count? I'm pretty sure I do.)

Well, you're on the BPFK list, which means that at the very least you care, so I'd vote that you count.

In any case, on the fairly safe assumption that no one will object, I removed them. Since the tiki has a history, in the event I assumed wrong, it's an easy fix anyway.

Also, since everything that wasn't deleted is up to snuff, I'm marking it blue now.

Everyone say Whoopeeee!!!

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.