On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Jonathan Jones
<eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
2010/10/8 Jorge Llambías
<jjllambias@gmail.com>
>> Where do we do our reviews? I'm not too happy with this example:
[...]
> Go ahead and change it, then.
It's marked as shepherded by somebody else. (You?)
If it's an anybody-can-edit-it section, it should not have a shepherd.
It marked as me being shepherd because the content is almost entirely mine. I wasn't under the impression that only a shepherd could edit a shepherded section, only that (s)he was the one /assigned/ to.
> Personally, I would say {.i.ienai ta ba'e na blanu}. If I wanted to disagree
> about {ta ba'e na blanu}, I would say {ta ba'e na.ienai blanu}.
That doesn't make much sense. In both cases "ienai" is attached to the
same bridi, just with a focused word in the second case.
mu'o mi'e xorxes
And in {.ienai .i li'o} it attaches to the more likely than not elided {vau}?
.i mi nelci lo va blanu gerku
.ienai .i ta ba'e na blanu
That looks to me like disagreement that it's a dog.
I'm certain that you'll agree with me on the meaning of this:
.i mi nelci lo va blanu gerku
.i go'i.ienai .i ta ba'e na blanu
To me, {.i.ienai li'o} is a shortcut for {.i go'i.ienai .i li'o}. (Assuming {na go'i.ienai} is disagreeing that {go'i} is NOT true.)