[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bpfk] BPFK work





2010/10/8 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/10/8 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
>>
>> Where do we do our reviews? I'm not too happy with this example:
[...]
> Go ahead and change it, then.

It's marked as shepherded by somebody else. (You?)

If it's an anybody-can-edit-it section, it should not have a shepherd.

It marked as me being shepherd because the content is almost entirely mine. I wasn't under the impression that only a shepherd could edit a shepherded section, only that (s)he was the one /assigned/ to.
 
> Personally, I would say {.i.ienai ta ba'e na blanu}. If I wanted to disagree
> about {ta ba'e na blanu}, I would say {ta ba'e na.ienai blanu}.

That doesn't make much sense. In both cases "ienai" is attached to the
same bridi, just with a focused word in the second case.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

And in {.ienai .i li'o} it attaches to the more likely than not elided {vau}?

.i mi nelci lo va blanu gerku
.ienai .i ta ba'e na blanu

That looks to me like disagreement that it's a dog.

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.