Re: [bpfk] BPFK work

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It marked as me being shepherd because the content is almost entirely mine.
> I wasn't under the impression that only a shepherd could edit a shepherded
> section, only that (s)he was the one /assigned/ to.

I don't really know what the rules are. I prefer that if something is
under my name, then other people not change what I write. But I'm
perfectly happy to cede any of "my" sections to anyone who wants it, I
just don't want it to be under my name if somebody else is editing it.
For that reason I don't like editing other people's sections either.
(Unless it's something minor like a typo, but not something like we
are discussing here.)


> And in {.ienai .i li'o} it attaches to the more likely than not elided
> {vau}?

It doesn't really attach to anything, but it is definitely not part of
the bridi after ".i"

> .i mi nelci lo va blanu gerku
> .ienai .i ta ba'e na blanu
>
> That looks to me like disagreement that it's a dog.

If the second line is by a second person, it's like a new text. It
doesn't have to be taken as one single text.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.