On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:I don't really know what the rules are. I prefer that if something is
>
> It marked as me being shepherd because the content is almost entirely mine.
> I wasn't under the impression that only a shepherd could edit a shepherded
> section, only that (s)he was the one /assigned/ to.
under my name, then other people not change what I write. But I'm
perfectly happy to cede any of "my" sections to anyone who wants it, I
just don't want it to be under my name if somebody else is editing it.
For that reason I don't like editing other people's sections either.
(Unless it's something minor like a typo, but not something like we
are discussing here.)
It doesn't really attach to anything, but it is definitely not part of
> And in {.ienai .i li'o} it attaches to the more likely than not elided
> {vau}?
the bridi after ".i"
If the second line is by a second person, it's like a new text. It
> .i mi nelci lo va blanu gerku
> .ienai .i ta ba'e na blanu
>
> That looks to me like disagreement that it's a dog.
doesn't have to be taken as one single text.
mu'o mi'e xorxes