[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bpfk] CLL errata check: lujvo scoring

At 02:39 AM 10/26/2010, Robin wrote:

Oh, also, it means the actual formally written out immediately
before is wrong, and possibly some of the surrounding verbiage.

It also makes negative lujvo possible, which seems icky.

-Robin

[snip]

> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 02:33:56AM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> > At the last minute we (which I think means Nora) decided to subtract
> > everything from 32500 so that higher values = better lujvo.  12.1
> > obviously got missed, so your fix is just the wrong way round.
Looking at calculations in my lujvo-making program ( I presume this is what you're referring to?), higher is better score: 
  In the program, a max of 6 pieces was handled.
        Luj.LujScore := (32 - length(Luj.Lujvo)) * 1000
                      + ApostTot * 500
                      + (5 - HyphenCount) * 100
                      + TypeTot * 10
                      + VowelTot;
So, since each piece if 5 characters or less, max length of lujvo is 30, so negative won't happen.
Note: TypeTot based on sum of type-scores of component rafsi (higher number is "better"): 
     Rafsi      Type-score
     -------    ----------------
     Cvc        5
     Ccv        7
     Cvv        8
     Cvhv       6
     Cvcc       2
     Ccvc       4
     Cvccv      1
     Ccvcv      3
mi'e .noras. 
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.