Re: [bpfk] BPFK work - getting it done.

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:

2010/10/14 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:

> I would like to at this time seek approval for removing the following
> entries from the BPFK Section: Tense page:
>
> {baba}¹
> {bapu}¹
> {puba}¹
> {pupu}¹
>
> {baca'a}²
> {caca'a}²
> {cajeba}²
> {puca'a}²
> {pujeba}²
> {pujeca}²
> {puza}²
> {puze'a}²
> {puze'i}²
> {puze'u}²
> {puzi}²
> {puzu}²
>
> ¹ Official meaning differs from usage, as well as being non-intuitive.
> ² Meaning is obvious given meaning of components and therefore does not need
> it's own entry.

I fully support their removal.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

So, all I need is Robin and/or And to agree, and there's a majority. .u'izo'o

Oops. I meant Arnt, not And.

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.