Re: [bpfk] doi cmima be bypyfyky zoi ly..tai,UAN..ly. cu ei gendra gi'i gendra

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 1:00 PM, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:

When I made that change to ilmentufa I did consider that too, and in the end I also went with the simpler rule, except it was to allow everything instead of nothing. I now think that the middle ground would be preferable, because camxes currently forbids a lot of easy-to-pronounce combinations while ilmentufa allows a few hard-to-distinguish ones.

Why "a lot" in one case and "a few" in the other?  Isn't it the same number for both? :) 

    diphthong = expr:( ( a u !u / ( (a i / e i / o i ) !i ) ) !nucleus ) {return _join(expr);}

This allows "taiuan" and "auie", but forbids "aiia" and "auua".

It makes some sense. It's sort of kind of similar to the "no double consonant" rule.

mu'o mi'e xorxes 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.