[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bpfk] camxes and syllabification in zi'evla



2014-10-26 19:54 GMT+03:00 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>:


On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:

2014-10-25 19:48 GMT+04:00 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>:

On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:

However, in general I don't see any problems with pronouncing {mastla}.

Why {mastra} is a fine brivla but {mastla} should not be (morphological classes apart)?

Because "tr" is a valid initial, while "tl" isn't. I wouldn't have a problem with making "tl" a valid initial, whereas I'm not happy with making "st" a valid coda.

Why? What's wrong with it?

It's too heavy. Core lojban words (cmavo/gismu/lujvo) don't have double-consonant codas.

Okay then. But then consonantal syllables are equally bad. Either it's Japanese CVCV intensive style or Serbian CCCC style but not somewhat Serbian, somewhat Japanese in different places.


mu'o mi'e xorxes 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.