Re: [bpfk] {ro}, existential import and De Morgan

[John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>]

Alex Burka scripsit:

> I understand {ro broda} to be the same as {ro da poi broda}, whereas {ro
> lo broda} is the one that's different (= {ro da poi me lo broda}). Not
> to put words in your mouth, but at least once in 2002[1] you agreed.

Yes, correct:  for "ro da poi broda cu brode" read "ro da zo'u da broda
.inaja da brode"

-- 
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan@ccil.org
        Sound change operates regularly to produce irregularities;
        analogy operates irregularly to produce regularities.
                --E.H. Sturtevant, ca. 1945, probably at Yale

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.