Re: [bpfk] {ro}, existential import and De Morgan

[Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com>]

Ok, so just to clarify what you were correcting, with importing {ro} you would say {ro broda cu brode} and {ro da poi broda cu brode} are the same thing and require {su'o da broda}, while {ro da ganai broda gi brode} is different and just requires a non-empty universe?

mu'o mi'e la durka

On Saturday, October 18, 2014 at 9:29 PM, John Cowan wrote:

Alex Burka scripsit:

I understand {ro broda} to be the same as {ro da poi broda}, whereas {ro

lo broda} is the one that's different (= {ro da poi me lo broda}). Not

to put words in your mouth, but at least once in 2002[1] you agreed.

Yes, correct: for "ro da poi broda cu brode" read "ro da zo'u da broda

.inaja da brode"

--

John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org

Sound change operates regularly to produce irregularities;

analogy operates irregularly to produce regularities.

--E.H. Sturtevant, ca. 1945, probably at Yale

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.

Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.