Re: [bpfk] Can we drop the fore tanru cmavo?

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

Isn't there a proposal to get rid of basically all the groups of connectives save one?

On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Robin Lee Powell
<rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
>
> i.e., can PEG support having one set of fore logical connectives
> only, or is the issue deeper than lookahead?

If the question is whether guheks can be replaced by geks, then the
answer is no, because tanru "gu'e broda gi brode" is different from
bridi "ge broda gi brode". Compare "(gu'e broda gi brode) ko'a" with
"ge (broda) gi (brode ko'a)".

If the question is whether guheks would be missed by anyone if they
were just dropped, then probably not. I don't think anyone ever uses
them.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.