Re: [bpfk] Can we drop the fore tanru cmavo?

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 03:54:44PM -0300, Jorge Llambías wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Robin Lee Powell
> <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> >
> > i.e., can PEG support having one set of fore logical connectives
> > only, or is the issue deeper than lookahead?
> 
> If the question is whether guheks can be replaced by geks, then
> the answer is no, because tanru "gu'e broda gi brode" is different
> from bridi "ge broda gi brode". Compare "(gu'e broda gi brode)
> ko'a" with "ge (broda) gi (brode ko'a)".

Yeah, I was afraid of that.  Thanks.

-Robin

-- 
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"
is "na nei".   My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.