Le jeudi 2 avril 2015 07:52:00 UTC+9, xorxes a écrit :On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:51 PM, guskant <gusni...@gmail.com> wrote:If you don't mind changing the order of words around {ze'ei}, we could modify the definition of {ze'ei} of MAI so that the usage should be "X Y bu ze'ei". So the definition of {xo'e} will be as you said:pa zo'e bu ze'eiNotice though that "pa zo'e bu" is a number, so "pa zo'e bu ze'ei" with "ze'ei" in MAI, would be a free modifier, not a digit.(I think PA and lerfu should not mix together to form numbers/lerfu-strings, but that's a different discussion.)ua lupa boi zo'e bu ze'eili'udrani .eiOther selma'o that couldn't be extended by this method, besides PA, would be ZO, LOhU, ZOI, ZEI, BY, BU, UI, tags, and maybe a few others. That's because free modifiers are not all that free.ieIn order to apply {ze'ei} to those cmavo, keeping {zo'e bu ze'ei pa} form seems better, permitting the difference between semantics and syntax. Actually, {ze'ei} is used only for definitions of experimental cmavo
, and it means that {X bu ze'ei} cluster is always put at the beginning of statement or fragment. Such {X bu ze'ei} cluster then can be naturally regarded as covering the whole line of definition. I don't know if any selma'o other than MAI can bring a better solution.--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.