Re: [bpfk] selma'o ZEhEI and PEG

[guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>]

Le jeudi 2 avril 2015 07:52:00 UTC+9, xorxes a écrit :

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:51 PM, guskant <gusni...@gmail.com> wrote:

 If you don't mind changing the order of words around {ze'ei}, we could modify the definition of {ze'ei} of MAI so that the usage should be "X Y bu ze'ei". So the definition of {xo'e} will be as you said: 

pa zo'e bu ze'ei

Notice though that "pa zo'e bu" is a number, so "pa zo'e bu ze'ei" with "ze'ei" in MAI, would be a free modifier, not a digit.

(I think PA and lerfu should not mix together to form numbers/lerfu-strings, but that's a different discussion.)

ua lu

pa boi zo'e bu ze'ei 

li'u

drani  .ei 

Other selma'o that couldn't be extended by this method, besides PA, would be ZO, LOhU, ZOI, ZEI, BY, BU, UI, tags, and maybe a few others. That's because free modifiers are not all that free.

ie

In order to apply {ze'ei} to those cmavo, keeping {zo'e bu ze'ei pa} form seems better, permitting the difference between semantics and syntax. Actually, {ze'ei} is used only for definitions of experimental cmavo, and it means that {X bu ze'ei} cluster is always put at the beginning of statement or fragment. Such {X bu ze'ei} cluster then can be naturally regarded as covering the whole line of definition. I don't know if any selma'o other than MAI can bring a better solution.

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.