On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 3:21 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:2015-04-07 1:52 GMT+03:00 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>:abs_tag_term =!gek tag !selbri !gek_sentence (sumti / joik_ek sumti_3 / KU_elidible)/ !gek (tag / FA_elidible) !selbri !gek_sentence sumti/ !gek sumti CO_clause tag/ NA_clause KU_clause/ !selbri !gek_sentence !ek !joik_jek !gihek NA_clause KU_elidible/ SOI_clause subsentenceCan you give some motivation for the "tag joik_ek sumti_3" term? No "FA joik_ek sumti_3" to go with it?...Thus FA is a tense modal now.I see. What about the first question, how do we interpret "bai .e do"? Is it "bai [zo'e] .e do"?
"NA_clause KU_clause" seems unnecessary, since it doesn't capture anything that wouldn't be captured by "!selbri !gek_sentence !ek !joik_jek !gihek NA_clause KU_elidible" does it? Same goes for the first "sumti", it doesn't catch anything that wouldn't be caught by the second one.Which two sumti ? In front of tag and then in front of FA_elidible?Yes (do you really think of the right side of a rule as the "front"?)The first "sumti" is not needed, just as the "NA_clause KU_clause". They don't contribute anything.mu'o mi'e xorxes--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.