[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bpfk] Proposal: sumti must always be tagged with "tag" even if it's elidible.

To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [bpfk] Proposal: sumti must always be tagged with "tag" even if it's elidible.
From: Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 13:27:11 +0200
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=ubRypeS6oXd4M38Cbpeiy+Wj4GF3W6xOxgJ2TlzrDBc=; b=g9rLKNfcQCDUkw8202tNngF08pzLKKLwhmqAw4ySbkOujSV7Y4HVPjcnVV71VL4iUq sfkrG0m7jPJXtsba4GpUQXfqh1RPH+XVNjV/GpretJOKQXXwr0vjayf1Ht9QIHtt/8Mn uir7tESfK4otTSflB8XbVsiUt+4gSDYoL7zs43ucSIeh6WA42Q2GblbQd9tFhbMDW8j3 h6jZnErJry8HTxRLrgK38XmEEvpKXyMlgGAWRjlAs/a4phIZoboKUHGxJdyDi/9bcDK0 1GGIlW9QuMBnZE2k2ngmaoDdWUUH6UXbJv5iLIKPHpZ10QSpDozYGAjsWA3cXjnkEaOr bfSQ==
In-reply-to: <CAO7tK2ckRDgQodpmDWgB7dHpKoHxLh=qDREYD9UENKq4SYSuxg@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-lis>
List-help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-id: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
List-post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+972099695765+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>, <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
References: <CAO7bV+gSSGpnQUG=P08yPspQqPRmbZrxH6jxvAFiabjdqfhCeg@mail.gmail.com> <CAO7tK2ckRDgQodpmDWgB7dHpKoHxLh=qDREYD9UENKq4SYSuxg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0

On 07/04/2015 00:52, Jorge Llambías wrote:

I don't really have any useful comments at this point because I'm still not up to speed with all the changes in this grammar.

You can find Camxes-exp's changelog [here]. It covers the changes that have been done until the end of last year. However, it hasn't been maintained recently.

mi'e la .ilmen. mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

References:
- [bpfk] Proposal: sumti must always be tagged with "tag" even if it's elidible.
  - From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
- Re: [bpfk] Proposal: sumti must always be tagged with "tag" even if it's elidible.
  - From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: [bpfk] A quick tool to test PEG for polite people.
Next by Date: [bpfk] Re: A quick tool to test PEG for polite people.
Previous by thread: Re: [bpfk] Proposal: sumti must always be tagged with "tag" even if it's elidible.
Next by thread: Re: [bpfk] Proposal: sumti must always be tagged with "tag" even if it's elidible.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread