Re: [bpfk] Re: FA as a TAG (Was: One cannot refer to inner nodes in Lojban PEG)

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:42 AM, guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com> wrote:

Le jeudi 9 avril 2015 09:15:04 UTC+9, xorxes a écrit :

 

.i ca'e ko'e du lo ka ce'u citka lo cakla kei lo ka lo cakla cu se citka ce'u

.i ca'e ko'a citka lo cakla

.i xu ko'a brodrfa ko'e .i xu ko'a brodrfe ko'e .i xu ko'a brodrfi ko'e

The last line should be formed with {citkrfV} and {selcitkrfV}, or more precisely, {fe zei lo zei cakla zei citkrfV} and {fa zei lo zei cakla zei selcitkrfV}.

ua! I didn't realize "brod" in "brodrfV" was a variable! I thought we were talking about just five predicates, "brodrfa", "brodrfe", ... "brodrfu". No wonder I was confused.

.i xu ko'a citkrfa ko'e .i go'i

.i xu ko'a citkrfe ko'e .i na go'i

.i xu ko'a citkrfi ko'e .i na go'i

.i xu ko'a selcitkrfa ko'e .i na go'i

.i xu ko'a selcitkrfe ko'e .i go'i

.i xu ko'a selcitkrfi ko'e .i na go'i

So "citkrfa" means something like "x1 is the eater in x2", "citkrfe" means "x1 is what gets eaten in x2", and so on. Then I think "du'u" does make sense:

citkrfa: x1 is that which proposition x2 claims eats.

citkrfe: x1 is that which proposition x2 claims is eaten.

Events could also make sense:

citkrfa: x1 is what eats when x2 happens.

citkrfe: x1 is what is eaten when x2 happens.

Or a property:

citkrfa: x1 eats when it has property x2

citkrfe: x1 is eaten when it has property x2

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.