Re: [bpfk] Re: te sumti detection using PEG

Subject: Re: [bpfk] Re: te sumti detection using PEG

From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 19:35:04 +0300

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=nrtqLDmE7/oH3rBpv0vxIAuA0HG4+xbP8bNjKHhKITs=; b=evy1PWP80+9cjkR70LhXKIAkl/sRJkz5GYh8tiNXE8JpiMkjQ2oeW6FILqqubpTaZB rQKnySexGHCI7VzT+3HOiXor+2ZFgz4yFrgrCH7OJXl6sN4yR9nsQjwR/P65QCFWm4qT x2wf98l/ULRSFFZyQYXpUjG2r+5vvXi044+H2wJE/tcos3tD3cfHGHKxeWjSAGlbxnFs BbpU1OJ6wHSECY02F1CGIMr0cgW64KOAiJ63JXPp0MeN1YJzGdC9aOXYGbjOIWTQ5kUx M7YE+8DCKqJa0bhRscc9359biVK4L7DWJVmwuZFU5nPhFCAa+/p8wsVtVGKz0EaUZWR9 Ed3g==

In-reply-to: <CACf3dP=FQ=JG7yshFQe45t9CLk+Cc2b=4FkK0vYtSsq641w8Cw@mail.gmail.com>

List-archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-lis>

List-help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>

List-id: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>

List-post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>

List-subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>

List-unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+972099695765+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>, <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>

Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com

References: <CAO7bV+g3dr6p-1foeJWNHMmOnP+mYb5XVqwpFWGqjhEejfBo-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAO7bV+ju-EW2VjnOsw9z_R9pXjx=8jAMdLkZ-oZY=k9v8XgftA@mail.gmail.com> <957EE20153214A1BBC5BA1C4A0DD63FC@gmail.com> <CAO7bV+itLQF9Yen0HeZhab83yWxrW20BkZQmdyg8TZZ=DjLujg@mail.gmail.com> <CACf3dP=FQ=JG7yshFQe45t9CLk+Cc2b=4FkK0vYtSsq641w8Cw@mail.gmail.com>

Reply-to: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com

Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com

2015-04-08 19:07 GMT+03:00 And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com>:

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
P.S. gua\spi was much better

What was the Guaspi rule?

It doesnt have a bridi head/tail distinction from which most complicacy comes:

You say something like

prami mi do

or like

love(you,I)

So it's VSO, or more correctly V O1 O2 O3 ...

Does there exist a list of the alternative candidate rules for Lojban and their pros and cons?

fi mi ta broda do - here, probably ta is x4 and do is x5.

Or judging from {mi prami do} a nintadni can think that do is x2.

Also ta might be x1 since nothing fills it so it might be reasonable to fill vacant slots in order.

One might make a research of which system (as you can see there are different problems here) is expected more in nature (although which natlangs have positional case system??? a study of psychological acceptance of programming languages might be better).

ke'u, I'm not interested in any solutions.

Maybe one should formalize all possible solutions for each independent part of FA-autorestoration system and other members of BPFK will vote.

--And.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

bpfk-list@googlegroups.com

http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list

https://groups.google.com/d/optout