ilmentufa/camxes appears to be missing a few of the changes to BPFK morphology that were made since October, specifically:
If there's any difference between the parse which is not attributable to one of these changes, then it's a bug. However, at least some of the differences are due to these rule changes.
What's wrong with these two? There's no CGV in them. "bad,nr,gru,te" and
"bak,nr,ze,bu".
I agree. These parse in my local camxes. Can you look into this, mukti?
{badnrgrute} and {baknrzebu} both parse without the change to the consonantal syllable rule in v132.
> catnrpepiskopo
What's wrong with this?
I don't know. mukti, can you debug this one as well?
Also due to change in v132. {cipnrpika}, {gurnrtefi} and many others are in the same category.
Are people familiar with the theory behind this change? Is it acceptable? Or is there a reason that it was not propagated? If it's not something that we want to keep, the BPFK morphology algorithm page should be updated to reflect that. On a related note, this might be a good time to start discussing the migration of the official BPFK work pages to the mediawiki.
I'll refrain from propagating these changes to jbovlaste/vlatai until there's a sense of what should be done.