[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bpfk] polysemy of {nai}

On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 11:53 AM, la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
> As it's still a BPFK thread my question is why did you suggest moving {nai}
> to UI in the long run when it shouldn't have the truth value?

I'm not sure I follow the part about truth values.

"nai" should be moved to CAI because it does the same as other CAI's,
it takes a word and changes it into something with the same function
and a systematically related meaning.

And CAI should be merged with UI because they have the exact same
syntax. It is pointless to have two selma'o with the same syntax.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.