Re: [bpfk] Finishing the BPFK sections

[selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>]

coi

I have finished the spatial tense sections (at least to a point where I 
think they are ready for a vote). Even though some were marked blue, 
they still contained mistakes and formatting problems. Most of those 
should be fixed now.

I notice that the way definitions are phrased differs between sections. 
Is this a problem? Should they rather match?

In any case, let's please vote on the entire supersection of spatial 
tenses (with one vote per section). I'll add polls to the pages. How 
long does the vote last? I suggest 1 week. (btw, if nobody is interested 
in voting any longer, then better to say so right away)

Also, in the case of non-contact spatial tenses, there is a slight 
conflict with {ru'u}. The rough definition in terms of {fi'o se sruri} 
doesn't explain how usages like {la .alis. cu ru'u limna} or {lo prenu 
cu ru'u catlu} work. I added a comment on the page which contains two 
possible explanations. This is a good example of usage doing one thing, 
and the ma'oste/CLL doing another, or rather, usage bending the meaning 
of a word to make it more useful in real life. But the BPFK still needs 
to decide what it means.

mi'e la selpa'i mu'o


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.