[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bpfk] Vote proxying?

To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [bpfk] Vote proxying?
From: And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 17:59:32 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=EoiwKKsUvKb1TYkaJg3PynmekyNwPz0lRCIleTogaQg=; b=ZAGzoHfGcR01LyWFeYMjyixZi3b8DELNLckTHTa4T95PjaKs2sX07yLKXYxsKxgF/b CsxKeRpPKbtapwBMxQF6/tGB6nQwN0atwZTj20wuBXw/YtD5zfk8aTW78iwiE8zQa4Qu 7IqGyuUac3z6AoKBSgvz0r3ETluTdWfhS/nVvACxTw7y7JzSxrBMvLCEqcv9LceicCXf /EOSUMevBQNdCZnaF6sE7P3RQ5mqVYu43fUlVy9QL/QO5jc/MpOd5x5mJQBM/RgjVWBc 7DbUpcIJ+7mkY/AwVNAuJJu8vfmJo5OSz25tR9l0CsmVr0kRE+TmXUCF1h3TJHglwVHq U2kw==
In-reply-to: <20140520164001.GC9283@mercury.ccil.org>
List-archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list>
List-help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-id: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
List-post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+972099695765+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
References: <CACf3dPkGGTvibA89Q1epNdVQnqmggo4Gzw1py0pCxv=XAOFgpg@mail.gmail.com> <CACf3dPn8hwqc3biqYicTyjUFMaVZ0e2jOf5YeFOJ-084Bog+Ag@mail.gmail.com> <20140520164001.GC9283@mercury.ccil.org>
Reply-to: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120711 Thunderbird/14.0

John Cowan, On 20/05/2014 17:40:

Is it legitimate to proxy one's vote on bpfk matters?


The LLG has traditionally accepted them, and the BPFK is a committee
of the LLG, formally speaking, so I see no reason why not.

John Cowan, LLG parliamentarian


In that case, I proxy mine to Xorxes. Experience has shown me that even in the rare cases where I don't agree with him from the outset, I soon come to realize that he was right after all.

I'd also like to point out that if enough bpfk members did likewise, the bpfk business could be zipped through without unnecessary delay and debate. Either decisions could simply be referred to Xorxes or else we could calculate how many Nays it takes to block a consensus and begin by counting contraxorxesian votes; only if there were sufficient contraxorxesian votes to block a consensus would it be necessary to struggle to find some other solution.

--And.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

References:
- [bpfk] Vote proxying?
  - From: And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com>
- Re: [bpfk] Vote proxying?
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [bpfk] {minli} place inconsistency
Next by Date: Re: [bpfk] Vote proxying?
Previous by thread: Re: [bpfk] Vote proxying?
Next by thread: Re: [bpfk] Vote proxying?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread