[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [jboske] Re: lo'edu'u

At 04:18 PM 12/14/02 +1100, Nick Nicholas wrote: 
4. The solomontean solution effectively wants a cmavo to attach to the
gadri, qualifying its epistemology. Since this is impossible, let us at
least insist that if this comes to pass (and I'm not a massive fan
right now), it attach to the sumti rather than the selbri --- since the
selbri is innocent of whatever people get up to when squinting. That
means not {lo'e merko be ma'e lesi'o cmacrnaveradja}, but {lo'e merko
NE ma'e lesi'o cmacrnaveradja}

I think this is what I said in my post, except that I would have presumed to use "pe" rather than "ne".

Sounds good to me.


--
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org