Re: [jboske] kau, take 2

[Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>]

That's a mouthful. I haven't read it yet, but that doesn't inhibit me from
heckling it!!

* Does your theory work for jikau, outside of any du'u and far from djuno?
I am terrified that we are ending up with a solution for makau that only
works with djuno, or at the broadest, djuno-style selbri.

* Do you address the sleight of hand that Jorge pulled, where ko'a gets
quantified like a da, while makau escapes such limitations? It's worse
than su'ono makau vs. su'opa ko'a. Check out the end of
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jboske/message/1042). There is probably a
digit we can prepend to ko'a to liberate it from being a fixed referent,
the opposite of the meaning assigned to tu'o by its hijackers.

* You say you missed recent struggles over kau. Did you know of my
identity abstractor, su'u ce'u broda kei be le kamdu'i, or li'o le
kamse'i?


-- 
jipno se kerlo
re mei re mei degji kakne