[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [jboske] lo'ie != lo'ei



On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 10:02:40PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Nick Nicholas wrote:
> 
> > So it now looks to me that, if we resolved "I'm looking for a doctor"
> > in Lojban as {mi sisku leka ce'u mikce}, then we should resolve this
> > intensional article with {ka}, as something like {le jai ka ce'u
> > mikce} (or {se ka}, or whatever.) And if this discussion were not so
> > utterly free form, I'd be able to find where someone had an objection
> > to that.
> 
> No objection here. We seem to be investigating a new level of rigor which,
> for once, I appreciate. "I like chocolate" is, at least, mi nelci lo jai
> ka cakla, whether or not this is aliased to this evening's interpretation
> of lo'e/le'e.
[...]

But assuming the same interpretation of jai from eariler, mi nelci
lo jai ka cakla is the same as mi nelci lo cakla....

-- 
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku

Attachment: pgp00042.pgp
Description: PGP signature