[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u

To: jboske@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:04:12 -0500 (EST)
In-reply-to: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMKEOPHBAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk> from "And Rosta" at Dec 13, 2002 02:01:34 AM

And Rosta scripsit:

> If anybody can think of a sane and consistent meaning for kau that is
> also consistent with usage, please explain it to me!

As far as I am concerned, asking what "kau" means by itself is like
asking what the "=" and "def" mean individually in a definition that
uses that notation. "kau" has purely contextual meaning.

-- 
One art / There is John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
No less / No more http://www.reutershealth.com
All things / To do http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
With sparks / Galore -- Douglas Hofstadter

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u
  - From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>

References:
- sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u
  - From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: [jboske] RE: Re: lo'edu'u
Next by Date: Re: [jboske] so, singulatives...
Previous by thread: frequency of reified relations (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u
Next by thread: RE: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread