[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka

To: jboske@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:32:22 -0500 (EST)
In-reply-to: <20021217151123.T49620-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> from "Invent Yourself" at Dec 17, 2002 03:13:20 PM

Invent Yourself scripsit:

> I don't have the book here,

I don't either.

> but are you quite sure the chapter on ka
> doesn't give an example or 2 of ce'u-less ka that's not equivalent to a
> du'u?

I believe it does, but I don't stand behind such examples; they are brain farts.

-- 
John Cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Is it not written, "That which is written, is written"?

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka
  - From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>

References:
- Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka
  - From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u
Next by Date: Re: [jboske] kau, take 2
Previous by thread: Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka
Next by thread: RE: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread