RE: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka

["And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>]

John:
> Invent Yourself scripsit:
> 
> > I don't have the book here,
> 
> I don't either 
> 
> > but are you quite sure the chapter on ka
> > doesn't give an example or 2 of ce'u-less ka that's not equivalent to a
> > du'u?
> 
> I believe it does, but I don't stand behind such examples; they are 
> brain farts 

and acknowledged to be so by John in the Great Ka Debate of '99.

(I don't know if it really was '99; it just sounds good. Probably
more recent than that actually, because it finished after the wiki
was born.)

--And.