RE: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei

["And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>]

John:
> Jorge Llambias scripsit:
> 
> > I agree with that last bit. On the other hand, {mi nitcu loi mikce}
> > says that there is some fraction of the mass of doctors such
> > that I need that fraction. Not what we want 
> 
> Au contraire, I think it is exactly what we want (if we can dismiss
> the "sundry detached doctor parts" interpretation) 

What if you need two doctors? loi mikce re mei? But on a true
massification analysis of loi, is there any difference between
loi mikce and loi mikce re mei?

--And.