[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?

To: jboske@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?
From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:58:41 +0000
Bcc:

la and cusku di'e

I would like to make two further proposals (I want them to be
taken jointly, not separately):

* cmavo for Average are lo'e & le'e
* cmavo for Unique are loi'e & lei'e and are made official.


I would prefer the reverse assignment, so that usage is not
invalidated.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

_________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?
  - From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: [jboske] jei clani (was: RE: Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka
Next by Date: RE: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau)
Previous by thread: Off-site jboske help (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?)
Next by thread: RE: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread