RE: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?

["And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>]

xorxes:
> la and cusku di'e
> 
> >I would like to make two further proposals (I want them to be
> >taken jointly, not separately):
> >
> >* cmavo for Average are lo'e & le'e
> >* cmavo for Unique are loi'e & lei'e and are made official 
> 
> I would prefer the reverse assignment, so that usage is not
> invalidated 

Noted. But I'll ignore it until the proposal goes to the BF,
assuming it wins enough approval to go to the BF.

On the officializing of additional gadri, I am now thinking
that it might be too much to ask of the BF. By my reckoning
there are 25 gadri, of which 11 are official. The 25 
comprise pa'ei plus a 6 * 4 grid with lo'i, lau'i, le'i, la'i
on one axis and on the other:
set
quantified (le, lo, la, lau'a)
massified
collectivized
average
unique

Since I don't hold out much hope for the BF officializing
14 new gadri, I don't see why I should care whether just 
one or two more gadri are officialized.

--And.