[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u




la and cusku di'e


Lojbab:
> Long scope prenex before connected sentences requires forethought, and
> hence tu'e/tu'u, which is probably an underutilized feature of the language


Definitely. "+1". (This message sent because it's nice to point out
occasions when we agree!)

I agree too, but I'm not sure Lojbab realizes that he's advocating a change in the baselined grammar. The current grammar does not permit the second connected sentence to have its own prenex.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail