[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE:



At 04:02 PM 12/18/02 +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote:
la and cusku di'e
>Lojbab:
> > Long scope prenex before connected sentences requires forethought, and
> > hence tu'e/tu'u, which is probably an underutilized feature of the
>language
>
>Definitely. "+1". (This message sent because it's nice to point out
>occasions when we agree!)

I agree too, but I'm not sure Lojbab realizes that he's
advocating a change in the baselined grammar. The current
grammar does not permit the second connected sentence to
have its own prenex.

Yes it does, but it needs to be inside tu'e/tu'u


prenex sentence ije tu'e prenex sentence tu'u

lojbab

--
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org