RE: [jboske] Digest Number 134

["And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>]

Lojbab:
> Somehow this discussion has ventured into the territory discussed in the 
> TLI resconsideration of subjunctives, which proposed just such a predicate 
> as And suggests
> 
> http://www.loglan.org/Articles/mia-subjunctives.html
> 
> This suggests that da'i can handle it, because so far as I can recall, pc 
> and Cowan reviewed that article and opined that we had the whole thing 
> well-covered 

I doubt it. As overample discussion has established, SL doesn't have 
subjunctivity well-covered, except in the trivial sense that it could
define brivla to express whatever meanings are involved in subjunctivity.

--And.