In a message dated 10/16/2002 2:57:57 PM Central Daylight Time, a.rosta@lycos.co.uk writes:
. JCB had it right
> originally and it was foolish (not to mention superfluous) to have
> changed it. {me} should be the brivla relativized in {pe}, as intended.
>
> (Maybe I should quit bitching and just invent a new -- longer --
> cmavo for the purpose:
> {pe'e'e} sounds to me like "posesses" (with a bad lisp)
In this particular instance, though, we don't need a cmavo -- a
lujvo would do. (Same goes for my construal of {me}, too.)
>>
Namely?
|