| In a message dated 10/16/2002 6:40:02 PM Central Daylight Time, arosta@uclan.ac.uk writes: << The solution I described in my original message is a general solution >> It would be nightmarish to make it fundamental to the language (sadistic, too). We all agree that forethoughting is a general solution except for the forethoughting part and that the usual afterthought devices won't work (unless you mean those three-levels-up --and two-places--over types that are even less practical than straight back-counting). |