RE: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and

["And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>]

John:
> Jorge Llambias scripsit:
> 
> > Isn't needing the exemplar box just what we mean by
> > needing a box?
> 
> I don't understand this at all. When I want a box, I want le variety of
> box, not a lo'e at all. Lo'e box may have altogether the wrong 
> characteristics 
> It may be that there are no such boxes, but le can cope 

{le} isn't right if you're after any box of a certain kind.
That would be {le'ei} or {lei'e}. If you're after any box
of not necessarily any kind, then
da poi klesi lo'i tanxe zo'u mi nitcu loi'e/lo'ei cmima be da

--And.