RE: [jboske] unresolved debates

["And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>]

John:
> And Rosta scripsit:
> 
> > * Usage overwhelmingly supports it; pretty much all prior usage
> > of so'V would be invalidated 
> 
> The first clause may be true, but the second is surely false. Nothing
> prevents "so'a" from meaning "all but an insignificant number" in 
> particular cases. I only object to drawing rigorous conclusions that 
> this relationship always holds 

so'a is the one member of the series whose meaning is the same in
both stories. But it and so'o are the least used, I think.

> > * We would need to find other ways to say "many/a few/most" 
> 
> "Most" in particular is known to be intractable 

Something like "more than (one in two)". But it warrants a word in
its own right.

> > chosen. Why wasn't {so'u} "almost none", and {so'i} "a middling
> > number" or "about half", or suchlike?
> 
> *shrug*
> 
> I wrote it up the way the Bobster told me to. I am not responsible for his
> choice of Logflash keywords 

Aye, I wasn't pointing the finger of blame, but I did mean to suggest
that it's hard to believe that the story was ever only as you tell it,
else such misleading keywords would not have been chosen. 

--And.