[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [jboske] interpretation of LAhE (was: RE: Digest Number 136

At 05:11 PM 1/6/03 +0000, And Rosta wrote: 
All of which just makes me yet more fed up with SL and the
current debate. We have got the point where we have to start
making decisions, either for SL via BF, or for AL. Currently,
everything is sinking into a quicksand of indeterminacy, and
all we have achieved is showing that virtually every
conceivable issue is shrouded in uncertainty due to the
incompleteness of the current prescription.

So maybe the debate should be put off until the BF gets to it. This is not the BF, and any debates herein are at best tentative. And if we put off the debates, Nick might have more time to get the BF going. (And I would have more time to spend on the never-ending accounting/orders problem.

lojbab

--
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org