Mail Index
[First Page][Prev Page][Next Page][Last Page]
- RE: [jboske] interpretation of LAhE (was: RE: Digest Number 136
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- RE: [jboske] {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution
- From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- RE: [jboske] Intensions: W
- From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
- SL & the 2nd Excellent Solution
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
- From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
- RE: [jboske] interpretation of LAhE (was: RE: Digest Number 136
- From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- RE: [jboske] Intensions: W
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
- From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
- From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- moratorium on SL debates (was: RE: interpretation of LAhE
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- "I want some xodium"
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- Re: [jboske] da'a
- From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
- Re: [jboske] Re: {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution
- From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
- Re: [jboske] Intensions: W
- From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
- From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
- Monty's Unicorns, Fermat version
- From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
- erratum
- From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
- Re: [jboske] Monty's Unicorns, Fermat version
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- metric prefixes
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- RE: [jboske] Re: {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- RE: [jboske] Hello over there
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- 3rd version of gadri system (3rd ExSol)
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- RE: [jboske] Monty's Unicorns, Fermat version
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- RE: [jboske] Hello over there
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- More from pc Re: [jboske] Monty's Unicorns, Fermat version
- From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
- From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
- pc's comments on Nick's: "Monty's Unicorns, Fermat version", and a couple other issues
- From: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
- Re: [jboske] Re: {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution
- From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
- Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
- From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
- Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
- From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
- RE: More from pc Re: [jboske] Monty's Unicorns, Fermat version
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- RE: [jboske] pc's comments on Nick's: "Monty's Unicorns, Fermat version", and a couple other issues
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
- From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
- RE: [jboske] Re: {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- Re: [jboske] Re: {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution
- From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
- Ontology #1
- From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- RE: [jboske] Re: {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- RE: [jboske] Hello over there
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
- From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
- From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
- RE: [jboske] pc's comments on Nick's: "Monty's Unicorns, Fermat version", and a couple other issues
- From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
- RE: [jboske] Hello over there
- From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
- lo/le definition
- From: Bob LeChevalier-Logical Language Group <lojbab@lojban.org>
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
- From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
- RE: [jboske] Hello over there
- From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
- RE: [jboske] pc's comments on Nick's: "Monty's Unicorns, Fermat version", and acouple other issues
- From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
- Re: [jboske] lo/le definition
- From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
- Re: [jboske] lo/le definition
- From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
- RE: [jboske] pc's comments on Nick's: "Monty's Unicorns, Fermat version", and acouple other issues
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- RE: [jboske] Hello over there
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- Re: [jboske] lo/le definition
- From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
- Re: [jboske] lo/le definition
- From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
- Re: [jboske] Ontology #1
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- RE: [jboske] Ontology #1
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- RE: [jboske] lo/le definition
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- RE: [jboske] lo/le definition
- From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
- RE: [jboske] Ontology #1
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- What is a lojbanmass? Quantification
- From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
- Re: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification
- From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
- Re: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification
- From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
- RE: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- RE: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification
- From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
- Re: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification
- From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
- Re: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification
- From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
- Re: [jboske] Ontology #1
- From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
- RE: Ontology #1
- From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
- RE: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- RE: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- RE: [jboske] Ontology #1
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- RE: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- Subject: RE: lo/le definition
- From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
- RE: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
- From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
- Re: [jboske] RE: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
- From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
- RE: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- Ontology #2
- From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
- RE: [jboske] Subject: RE: lo/le definition
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- Re: [jboske] 3rd version of gadri system (3rd ExSol)
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- RE: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- Re: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification
- From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
- RE: [jboske] 3rd version of gadri system (3rd ExSol)
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- RE: [jboske] Subject: RE: lo/le definition
- From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
- RE: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- RE: [jboske] 3rd version of gadri system (3rd ExSol)
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- Re: [jboske] RE: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
- From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
- Re: [jboske] RE: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
- From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
- The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134))
- From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
- The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134))
- From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
- RE: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- Re: [jboske] Ontology #2
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- Retract Ontology #2
- From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
- Re: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134))
- From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
- ExSol ver 4.0
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- Aristotelian vs. modern logic
- From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3