On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 09:40:14PM -0000, And Rosta wrote:
> Lojbab:
> > At 03:49 PM 1/6/03 +0000, And Rosta wrote:
[...]
> > The exporting rule and the free movement rule are a contradiction in CLL
> >
> > Chapter 15, 7.1/7.2 say that
> > mi napu klama le zarci
> > means the same as
> > mi punai klama le zarci
> > but this would violate the export rule if selbri tense is handled
> > differently from selbri negation
> >
> > puku mi na klama le zarci
> > is not
> > punaiku mi klama le zarci
> > because of the differential exporting rule
>
> Don't {mi na pu klama} and {mi pu nai klama} both mean {na ku mi pu ku
> klama}, according to CLL?
[...]
Yes. CLL explicitly says that "na pu" and "pu na" have no difference
in meaning. Also PU/FAhA+NAI is the same as just putting a naku
in front of the prenex. This was discussed on the main list after
an argum^H^H^H^H^Hdiscussion me and Adam had on irc about it a while
ago. I can pull out the CLL quotes if people don't wanna search
the archives though.
--
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku
Attachment:
pgp00176.pgp
Description: PGP signature