On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 07:04:58AM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> Robert LeChevalier scripsit:
> > >Is {da'a} by itself {da'apa} or {da'asu'o}? The latter is
> > >indeed equivalent to {me'iro}.
> >
> > It is elliptical in the same way that all of the other omitted words are
> > elliptical.
>
> Well, no. CLL 18.8 specifies that "da'a" by itself is "da'apa",
> "all but one". Further, in ordinal contexts it means "all but the last".
Huh? Shouldn't it be "the second-to-last"? I've only seen it used
to mean that.... Maybe that's what you meant?
--
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku
Attachment:
pgp00174.pgp
Description: PGP signature