RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134))

[Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>]

On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, And Rosta wrote:


> So if there's no agent then it's not a catra relationship. It's
> a se catra be zi'o property. Take a relationship between an agent
> and an undergoer -- a dier.



A dier? Or a diar?




-- 
// if (!terrorist)
// ignore ();
// else
collect_data ();