[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism&c. (was: Digest Number 134))

To: <jboske@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism&c. (was: Digest Number 134))
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 20:32:21 -0000
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <20030113144314.L4788-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net>

xod:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, And Rosta wrote:
> 
> > So if there's no agent then it's not a catra relationship. It's
> > a se catra be zi'o property. Take a relationship between an agent
> > and an undergoer -- a dier 
> 
> A dier? Or a diar?

I don't know whether this is a joke, but either way I don't understand.
"Dier" = "one who dies", "moriturus".

--And.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism&c. (was: Digest Number 134))
  - From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>

References:
- RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134))
  - From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>

Prev by Date: RE: [jboske] Re: Link on (Intensional) Masses
Next by Date: TOTALLY OT: philosophy & yawning (was: RE: Lojban is fxxxed
Previous by thread: RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134))
Next by thread: RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism&c. (was: Digest Number 134))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread