[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[jbovlaste] Re: proceed/continue/advance

To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: proceed/continue/advance
From: Theodore Reed <ted.reed@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:05:01 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mWK6UuzLUYkOmvnXYlRDSJevHVFTdoxb2b97NEYBEQ4=; b=RwyDaH3OtPH3AKdscMI9HY4VLVCzALtEpypN0OzJ1SgEgSEDOGNpBzLXpAjGOE9zJa 8hcFYvtoN7lIxJ5A+/4d9Bup00ZLX3v62k9ZBbSsr+85kABut/dn3jg0QkpPYHl0+I09 2gd/2+6c6Sn+nSZ547KzjPed3ttXSu5yzRmY8=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=na4TEMYV0YeIpPHtGR72dtT7pJKawosmxicAZ1VBi+rYlHovvv+V3M69taedQpFeIX Iv/Y/YHEI6aWemya5GyIVvL30aTNHCKvb8Y4vwoUVfaWxkbALwkdInyK10hmVYbtakiy rpTNnRzvN8Ch7umRjmnWeuSq3Cdm8dSM3Uhc0=
In-reply-to: <AANLkTikyormhAUaV=G1nwaxn=TnEE0zHX08kL=dc51PJ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikyormhAUaV=G1nwaxn=TnEE0zHX08kL=dc51PJ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org

ranji?

maybe with something to indicate forward motion?

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 13:56, Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:

I'm leaning towards lamyzu'e --

z1 proceeds/continues/advances/takes the next step l1=z2 in sequence of actions l3 towards goal z3 after step l2

But I'm not really liking it..

Opinions? Better options?

It feels like it should be pruce-based, but I can't figure out how.

--gejyspa

References:
- [jbovlaste] proceed/continue/advance
  - From: Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: [jbovlaste] proceed/continue/advance
Next by Date: [jbovlaste] Re: proceed/continue/advance
Previous by thread: [jbovlaste] proceed/continue/advance
Next by thread: [jbovlaste] Re: proceed/continue/advance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread